Definition: But in all this [time] was not I at Jerusalem: for in the two and thirtieth year of Artaxerxes king of Babylon came I unto the king, and after certain days obtained I leave of the king:

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from Nehemiah 13:6. It's a really interesting and somewhat mysterious passage! Here’s what it essentially means in simpler terms: The Basic Story: Nehemiah was in Jerusalem: In the 20th year of King Artaxerxes, who ruled over Babylon, Nehemiah was still in Jerusalem. He was overseeing rebuilding efforts after a long period of chaos and instability. He was sent to the king: The king of Babylon sent a messenger to ask for Nehemiah’s presence. He left… quickly: Nehemiah didn't stay long. After certain days, he left the city. What it’s saying – It’s about a delay and a secret departure: The verse is telling us that Nehemiah was not physically in Jerusalem during that time. He wasn't there to oversee rebuilding or rule over the city. He left quickly because of a specific situation involving the king of Babylon. Possible Interpretations (It’s a bit open to interpretation, which is why it's interesting): A Secret Mission: It suggests that Nehemiah had a secret mission – perhaps he was gathering information or delivering a message to the king. Avoiding Trouble: Leaving quickly could have been a deliberate act to avoid potential conflict with Babylon, especially given their power and control over Jerusalem. Political Strategy: Perhaps it was a strategic move to maintain some level of influence or to protect himself from being targeted by Babylon. Key Takeaway: The verse is about a delay in Nehemiah’s presence in Jerusalem due to the circumstances surrounding King Artaxerxes' visit and his subsequent actions. It highlights a moment of secrecy and potential maneuvering. --- Do you want me to: Explain any of these interpretations further? Provide context about the time period (the 20th year of Artaxerxes)? Discuss the significance of this passage in biblical history?